ABSTRACT
Background: In 2018 we reported the emergence of the new HIV-1 recombinant CRF94-02BF2 involved in a large transmission cluster of 49 French MSM mostly infected in 2016-2017. This CRF94 raised concerns of enhanced virulence. Prevention actions were undertaken in the area and population affected. This study reported the molecular and epidemiological evolution of this CRF94 until June 2022. Method(s): In 2021-2022, French sequence databases were screened for patients infected with HIV-1 subtype CRF94 or similar strain. HIV subtyping was confirmed by phylogenetic analysis of genes encoding both protease and reverse transcriptase (1070bps), and integrase (696bps) using IQ-Tree. Five whole genomes, related but distinct from CRF94, were obtained with the DeepChek assay Whole Genome kits. Recombination breakpoints were estimated using RDP4 and SimPlot. Mann-Whitney and LogRank tests were used for statistical analyses to compare patients' characteristics. Result(s): In June 2022, 49 new HIV-1 sequences were collected: 14 clustered with the 49 previous CRF94, 32 formed a new cluster next to but distinct from CRF94, and 3 strains could not be classified. Analysis of 5 whole genomes from the new cluster revealed a new recombinant, the CRF132-94B, mainly consisting of CRF94 which recombined with subtype B in the POL and accessory genes. Vif gene changed from the F2 to the B subtype. Both CRF94 and 132 clusters involved >95% of MSM, mostly infected < 1 year before diagnosis. However, there were differences: 97% were diagnosed in 2013-2019 for CRF94 vs 90% in 2020-2022 for CRF132. At time of diagnosis, 33% of patients infected with CRF94 knew the Prep vs 95% for CRF132. In the cluster CRF94, patients were older (34 vs 30 years, p=0.02), had higher viral loads (5.42 vs 4.42 log10 copies/Ml;p< 0.001), a lower CD4 cell counts (358 vs 508 /mm3, p=0.002). On treatment, the patients with the CRF94 reached viremia < 50 copies/Ml significantly later than those infected with CRF132 (p=0.0002). The prevention activities targeting the CRF94 cluster could explained the few patients infected with this strain after 2018. The CRF132 is mainly located in another Paris region area, but no specific transmission place has been identified. Conclusion(s): After 2019, the CRF94 spread seems greatly slowed down but the very close CRF132-94B has given birth to a new highly active cluster in 2020- 2022, despite the COVID social-distancing and a strong knowledge of the Prep. CRF132 appears to be less virulent perhaps due to the Vif gene change. Identified breakpoints positions of the new HIV-1 CRF132-94B. GenBank accession numbers of the five references : ON901787 to ON901791.
ABSTRACT
VIROLOGICAL ASPECTS, DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS AND VARIANTS OF SARS-COV-2 SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped non-segmented linear single-stranded positive RNA virus. The envelope carries the protein spike (S) which recognizes the ACE2 receptor on the target cell and allows entry of the virus. The numerous mutations on the S protein are at the origin of a great genetic diversity, involved in the species barrier and the escape from neutralizing antibodies. The main mode of transmission is respiratory. The virus replicates 24 hours after infection and the viral RNA is detected by direct diagnostic techniques as the reference technique is RT-PCR on a nasopharyngeal sample. To expand screening, RT-PCR on saliva samples and antigenic tests have been developed. The majority of patients develop specific antibodies within 10-15 days which are detectable by serological methods. It is recommended to combine the search for anti-N and anti-S antibodies. The viral genome has great plasticity and variants emerged from the summer of 2020. There are several classifications, including that of the WHO, which assigns each variant a Greek letter. Finally, Sante publique France has deployed an epidemiological surveillance system of variants using PCR screening and sequencing.
ABSTRACT
While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has peaked in many countries already, the current challenge is to assess population immunity on a large scale. Many serological tests are available and require urgent independent validation. Here, we report performance characteristics of Orient Gene Biotech COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Cassette (OG) and compare it to Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassay (ASIA). Patients (n = 102) with a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) were tested. The patients were asymptomatic (n = 2) or had mild (n = 37) or severe symptoms requiring hospitalization in a medical unit (n = 35) or intensive care unit (n = 28). Specificity was evaluated for 42 patients with previous viral and parasitic diseases as well as a high level of rheumatic factor. The sensitivity of OG was 95.8% (95% confidence interval [CI95%], 89.6 to 98.8) for samples collected >=10 days after the onset of symptoms, which was equivalent to the sensitivity of ASIA of 90.5% (CI95%, 82.8 to 95.6). OG uncovered six false-negative results of ASIA, of which two had only IgM with OG. Specificity was 100% (CI95%, 93.4 to 100) with both tests on samples, including patients infected with endemic coronavirus. Overall, OG performance characteristics indicate that the test is suitable for routine use in clinical laboratories, and its performance is equivalent to that of immunoassay. Testing OG on a larger asymptomatic population may be needed to confirm these results.